From noreply at release.debian.org Mon Sep 15 05:39:06 2025 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing autoremoval watch) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 04:39:06 +0000 Subject: [Debian-astro-maintainers] saods9 is marked for autoremoval from testing Message-ID: saods9 8.6+repack-6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-10-13 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1098004: tk-table: ftbfs with GCC-15 https://bugs.debian.org/1098004 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl From olebole at debian.org Mon Sep 15 09:06:09 2025 From: olebole at debian.org (Ole Streicher) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 10:06:09 +0200 Subject: [Debian-astro-maintainers] Bug#1096853: No longer marked as fixed in versions iraf-mscred/5.05+2018.07.09-4 References: Message-ID: <49d407fb-5798-4e63-9c3c-ecf2384b204b@debian.org> Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Sebastian, I could just rebuild the package locally without any changes from unstable (specifically with iraf-2.18.1-2, 2.18~ resolved the problem upstream). Can you explain why you consider this bug as not fixed? Cheers Ole From owner at bugs.debian.org Mon Sep 15 09:07:02 2025 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:07:02 +0000 Subject: [Debian-astro-maintainers] Processed: Re: No longer marked as fixed in versions iraf-mscred/5.05+2018.07.09-4 References: <49d407fb-5798-4e63-9c3c-ecf2384b204b@debian.org> Message-ID: Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #1096853 {Done: Santiago Vila } [src:iraf-mscred] iraf-mscred: ftbfs with GCC-15 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1096853: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1096853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems From sramacher at debian.org Mon Sep 15 10:11:52 2025 From: sramacher at debian.org (Sebastian Ramacher) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 11:11:52 +0200 Subject: [Debian-astro-maintainers] Bug#1096853: No longer marked as fixed in versions iraf-mscred/5.05+2018.07.09-4 In-Reply-To: <49d407fb-5798-4e63-9c3c-ecf2384b204b@debian.org> References: <49d407fb-5798-4e63-9c3c-ecf2384b204b@debian.org> Message-ID: On 2025-09-15 10:06:09 +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Sebastian, > > I could just rebuild the package locally without any changes from unstable > (specifically with iraf-2.18.1-2, 2.18~ resolved the problem upstream). Can > you explain why you consider this bug as not fixed? The bug was marked as found and fixed in the same version. This makes the BTS consider it us unfixed even if marked as closed. The canonical fix for this is to remove to fixed version. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher From noreply at release.debian.org Tue Sep 16 05:39:09 2025 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 04:39:09 +0000 Subject: [Debian-astro-maintainers] casacore 3.7.1-2 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the casacore source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.7.1-1 Current version: 3.7.1-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Tue Sep 16 05:39:09 2025 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 04:39:09 +0000 Subject: [Debian-astro-maintainers] astroscrappy 1.2.0-2 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the astroscrappy source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.2.0-1 Current version: 1.2.0-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Tue Sep 16 05:39:14 2025 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 04:39:14 +0000 Subject: [Debian-astro-maintainers] montage 6.1+dfsg-2 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the montage source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 6.1+dfsg-1 Current version: 6.1+dfsg-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Tue Sep 16 05:39:15 2025 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 04:39:15 +0000 Subject: [Debian-astro-maintainers] pybdsf 1.13.0-2 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the pybdsf source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.13.0-1 Current version: 1.13.0-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Tue Sep 16 05:39:17 2025 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 04:39:17 +0000 Subject: [Debian-astro-maintainers] splash 3.11.5-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the splash source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.11.4-1 Current version: 3.11.5-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 16 14:13:03 2025 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:13:03 +0000 Subject: [Debian-astro-maintainers] Processed: eso-midas: ftbfs with GCC-15 References: Message-ID: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reopen 1096587 Bug #1096587 {Done: Ole Streicher } [src:eso-midas] eso-midas: ftbfs with GCC-15 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer marked as fixed in versions src:eso-midas/25.05pl1.1-1 and 25.05pl1.1-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1096587: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1096587 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems From sanvila at debian.org Tue Sep 16 14:11:09 2025 From: sanvila at debian.org (Santiago Vila) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:11:09 +0200 Subject: [Debian-astro-maintainers] Bug#1096587: eso-midas: ftbfs with GCC-15 References: Message-ID: reopen 1096587 thanks Hi. Sorry for the reopening, but this is failing right now in unstable with this error: oss.c: In function ?osscatch?: oss.c:141:5: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition] 141 | int osscatch(sig, f) | ^~~~~~~~ oss.c:157:18: error: assignment to ?__sighandler_t? {aka ?void (*)(int)?} from incompatible pointer type ?FUNCTION? {aka ?void (*)(void)?} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] 157 | act.sa_handler = f; | ^ In file included from oss.c:63: /usr/include/signal.h:72:16: note: ?__sighandler_t? declared here 72 | typedef void (*__sighandler_t) (int); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ oss.c:75:16: note: ?FUNCTION? declared here 75 | typedef void (*FUNCTION)(); /* Pointer to Function */ | ^~~~~~~~ which seems gcc-15 related to me. Note 1: When the current version of "eso-midas" was uploaded for unstable, gcc-15 was not the default yet. Apparently, gcc-15 was uploaded a day later, and that made the build on hppa to FTBFS: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=eso-midas&arch=hppa&ver=25.05pl1.1-1&stamp=1757030205&raw=0 The way it failed on hppa 11 days ago is the same way it fails on amd64 now if you try to rebuild it now. Note 2: it is possible that this bug is "different" than the one originally reported by Matthias, but the title (i.e. "FTBFS with gcc-15") still holds, so I prefer to reopen this one instead of filing a new bug. I've put a recent build log here: https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202509/ Thanks.