Fwd: kiwix: status after two sessions with Renaud (upstream member) and Mike (packaging team member)

[Emmanuel Engelhart]

On 06/11/2012 12:12 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mo 11 Jun 2012 11:33:57 CEST Mike Gabriel wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> On Mo 11 Jun 2012 11:05:45 CEST Mike Gabriel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mo 11 Jun 2012 10:18:31 CEST renaud gaudin wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 06/11/2012 05:27 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>>>>> Maybe upstream agrees to bump another upstream release (0.9-beta6)? So
>>>>> we get rid of that funny Date+SVN version string. It is optional,
>>>>> but an
>>>>> option(?).
>>>>
>>>> Beta6 it is.
>>>>
>>>> http://download.kiwix.org/src/kiwix-0.9-beta6.tar.gz
>>
>> W: kiwix source: rc-version-greater-than-expected-version 0.9-beta6 >
>> 0.9 (consider using 0.9~beta6)
>> W: kiwix: rc-version-greater-than-expected-version 0.9-beta6 > 0.9
>> (consider using 0.9~beta6)
>> N: 2 tags overridden (2 warnings)
>>
>>
>> With 0.9-beta6 (hyphen) I get the above lintian warning (again). So,
>> the orig tarball should better be 0.9~beta6 (tilde) (again). ,,Again''
>> means here: I already did this rewrite in the tarball name for the
>> nightly SVN snapshots.
>>
>> What do others think?
>> Mike
>
> Just for the record, I pushed the renamed tarball to the upstream branch.

Does it means kiwix is in debian experimental?

Emmanuel