kiwix_0.9~beta6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Mike Gabriel]

Hi Renaud, hi Kelson,

On Mi 20 Jun 2012 11:01:43 CEST renaud gaudin wrote:

> On 06/20/2012 08:19 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>> So, my question to upstream is: does it make sense to you to split
>> libzim and kiwix apart? If so, libzim has to provide versioned library
>> .so files. These then can be installed to /usr/lib/<arch> on Debian
>> (/usr/lib by make install). This should IMHO the long-run approach.
>>
>>> Will that be possible? I know we can do it to /usr/lib but not sure
>>> how to handle <arch> stuff as it differs on different architecture.
>
> Hi,
>
> I discussed it with Kelson and we actually have 3 libraries used this way:
> * libzim
> * libpugixml
> * libcttp2
>
> Those libraries are used only for Kiwix now so since we don't have  
> time _right now_ to package them individually, we'd prefer to go the  
> way we are now.
>
> Still, we believe it would be better to package all three separately  
> for the next version.
>
> Is that OK with you guys?

That was my suggestion!!!

Mike

-- 

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, rothenstein 5, 24214 neudorf-bornstein
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B
mail: mike.gabriel at das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-edu-pkg-team/attachments/20120621/4c0f4efa/attachment.pgp>