[Debian-ha-maintainers] Why was the original corosync repository dropped?

[Richard B Winters]

On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 11:17 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Richard B Winters <rik at mmogp.com> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:59 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> > 
> >> Why was the original corosync repository (keeping the good work of the
> >> previous maintainers, mainly Martin Loschwitz and Guido Günther) moved
> >> away and replaced by a lesser one containing dsc imports only?  Did I
> >> miss the discussion on the mailing list?  Why would we want to drop the
> >> history, especially that those commits are still referenced in the
> >> changelog?
> >
> > It's not dropped, its still there, just renamed; I didn't want to mess
> > with their work which is why I had done it. It can be put back at any
> > time.
> 
> Fine, then put it back, please, and apply the recent work on top of the
> original history.

I believe you can go ahead and do that yourself, after you verify with
the others that they don't have pending changes.

Once you have, I'll go ahead and rename the old repository so its
visible and set any permissions you may need on the two repositories to
do so, though as a fair warning I'm not going to be in any rush for your
_bike-shedding_.

If other's want to go ahead and cater to you before I get to it, that's
fine by me.

Best,


-- 
Rik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-ha-maintainers/attachments/20150523/ce28c533/attachment.sig>