[Debian-ha-maintainers] Pacemaker packaging

[Ferenc Wagner]

Hi,

I almost went through the packaging of Pacemaker 1.1.13.  A couple of
questions arose:

1. Richard put in Lintian overrides like this:

   # init.d scripts not registered with update-rc.d since other components are meant to start/stop pacemaker
   # and friends at system boot
   pacemaker-remote binary: script-in-etc-init.d-not-registered-via-update-rc.d

   What are those "other components"?  What happens under systemd?

2. Richard also put in Lintian overrides like this:

   # False positive; is as intended by upstream
   pkg-config-bad-directive

   Richard, could you please point us to your communications with
   upstream forming the base of the above comment?  Declarations like

   with_upstart=@SUPPORT_UPSTART@
   with_systemd=@SUPPORT_SYSTEMD@

   don't seem particularly useful to me.

3. Do we want to provide numbered dev packages, like liblrmd1-dev?  I
   don't think we want to support several API versions concurrently, so
   I dropped the numbers from the dev package names for now.

4. Lintian is not happy about the init script for pacemaker_remote
   providing pacemaker_remoted (note the final d).  Should we just
   remove the d and thus synchronize to pacemaker_remote.service?

5. I dropped the CTS stuff from here as well, just like from Corosync.
   This made the pacemaker-dev (probably long misnamed) package
   disappear with all the Python stuff, too.  Objections?

More will come later, but let's start with the above...
-- 
Thanks,
Feri.