[Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#738704: Bug#738704: closed by wferi at niif.hu (Ferenc =?UTF-8?Q?W=C3=A1gner?=) (Re: pacemaker: Segfault in libhbclient.so.1.0.0)

[Ferenc Wágner]

Philipp Marek <philipp.marek at linbit.com> writes:

>> Pacemaker isn't built with Heartbeat support anymore.  I recommend to
>> migrate to Corosync 2.
>
> That's too bad, because
>
>>> I'm using 4 physical network interfaces, so corosync won't do.

Do you mean that Corosync won't let you use independent links for
heartbeat and cluster communication?  I think the usual recommendation
is to bond them, but Corosync also supports this natively under the name
RRP (redundant ring protocol).  Why doesn't this work for you?
-- 
Regards,
Feri.