[Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#804590: Bug#804590: redhat-cluster: build-depends on libcorosync-dev which is no longer built
Ferenc Wagner
wferi at niif.hu
Sat Jan 16 13:50:55 UTC 2016
Christoph Berg <myon at debian.org> writes:
> Re: Ferenc Wagner 2016-01-14 <87oacottgd.fsf at lant.ki.iif.hu>
>
>> It does, unless -s is used. I pretty much rewrote the whole thing, you
>> can check it on GitHub. But please don't upload just yet, I'd like to
>> see pacemaker migrating into testing first. :)
>
> Dropping a note here, these need to be addressed before the migration will
> happen: (crmsh is in testing, pacemaker-mgmt is not)
>
> # Broken Build-Depends:
> crmsh: libcib3-dev
> libcrmcommon3-dev (>= 1.1.8+git20121010)
> libcrmservice1-dev
> liblrmd1-dev
> libpe-rules2-dev
> libpe-status4-dev
> libpengine4-dev (>= 1.1.8+git20121010)
> libstonithd2-dev
> libtransitioner2-dev
> pacemaker-mgmt: pacemaker-dev (>= 1.1)
Hmm, so that's why pacemaker hasn't migrated yet. I also spent some
time with the tracker, and couldn't find anything but
https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=pacemaker with
surprising statements like:
pacemaker is not yet built on amd64: 1.1.13-2 vs 1.1.14~rc4-2 (missing 16 binaries)
corosync is only in unstable (no testing version)
I can't make any sense of these, can you?
On the other hand, I really wonder why crmsh does not depend on
pacemaker (only recommends it). But we'll have to update it anyway.
By the way, Pacemaker 1.1.14 has been released, I'll fold it in
shortly. And we'll also have to switch gfs2-utils and ocfs-tools to the
new stack, so that redhat-cluster can finally be removed from the
archive. If only dlm passed NEW already...
--
Regards,
Feri.
More information about the Debian-ha-maintainers
mailing list