[Debian-ha-maintainers] libqb priority

[Christoph Berg]

Re: Ferenc Wágner 2016-06-20 <87porb51y5.fsf at lant.ki.iif.hu>
> What do you think about renaming the branches to the DEP14 scheme also
> used by Corosync and Pacemaker?  It's possible to go on without, but I
> find it more natural for the upstream master to appear explicitly.

I don't fancy it very much, but it's certainly preferable to use the
same layout for all packages in the group, so please go ahead!

Christoph