[Debian-in-workers] Red Hat signs MoU with Kerala govt
Anivar Aravind
anivar.aravind at gmail.com
Fri Jun 8 06:57:32 UTC 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This mail seems that you are more focused on claims to kep ur ego than
the facts . I dont want to continue this non productive discussion based
on your articulated views with a lot of misconceptions. It only serves
your ego. I dont want to spam Others in this list. This will be my last
to this Thread in this list
Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
> Anivar Aravind said on Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:27:46AM +0530,:
>
> > > Apart from Arun's ``I say so'', what are these statistics based on?
> >
> > http://www.hindu.com/2006/05/08/stories/2006050811430400.htm
>
> I am very much afraid that this article, or Biju Prabhakar's views do
> not reflect the ground realities.
Still u your rabbit has 3 hones. "Ground realities" are related to the
ground. not your mind.
> (That article coincides with the day my kid was born, so I believe I
> missed it).
>
> The next question is probably off topic for this list and thread - the
> URL says that the FSF India created the CD for IT at SCHOOL project; but
> my understanding is that space-kerala.org is doing it. Which is true?
That is the Problem with Your understanding
It is well Written every CD's of IT at school & On Readme Files.
If you ever seen a CD you can understand that
And I already posted the following URL here earlier
http://www.edugrid.in/webfolder/download/schoolGnu/README.html
> > BTW Did u seen
> > http://support.space-kerala.org/wiki/index.php/School_GNU_Linux_FAQ
> > And
> > http://support.space-kerala.org/wiki/index.php/School_GNU_Linux_Tips
> > Before making authoritative comments?
>
> Which still does not answer my question -- ``where does the government
> say that it is using free software in the IT at SCHOOL project?''
Dont try to manipulate questions. This was in answer to
<quote>
And there is nothing - absolutely nothing -- on space-kerala.org or
it at school website or KSITM (kerala state IT Mission) website to
provide continued support for the kind of roll out required now.
</quote>
So From where your new "my question" appeared? The Lawyers are infamous
for quoting outof context in courts. But In Email lists It will not work
everytime
> Some years back, a government agency started packaging a version of
> GNU Linux for the IT at SCHOOL project. One fine morning, it was splashed
> all over the Malayalam language news papers that IT at SCHOOL is going to
> violating some ``intellectual property'' if it goes ahead with the
> proposed CD.
>
> There was a big song and dance by so many so many of ``community
> leaders'' about IT at SCHOOL violating the sanctity of rights. The
> community, instead of helping the government agency to fix the
> problems took care to give that project (and the government agency
> behind it) a bad name.
You still running on out of memory. It was about RedHAT based custom
Distribution for Akshaya Project created by CDIT, a quasi-govt
institute. Please Dont FUD
> Few months later, IT at SCHOOL gave the contract to building the cd for
> IT at SCHOOL to the community.
FUD Happens!!! Again & Again
>> This happened a few months before you became involved with Free
> Software (at least, actively on the internet).
You are not the person for counting my involvement in free software.
You can say that it may be sometimes before we met. I am a GNU/User
atleast before 2 years before that. The same with "Active in Internet"
Clause too
> That scenario is repeating now. Probably there is something wrong with
> the MoU (I cannot identify it yet). And the community, instead of
> working the persons involved, is giving the MoU a bad name.
The issues here are
1. The MoU is not published so far & It is happened in a non-transparent
manner.
2. If It is a decision affecting the society( specifically on IT at school
case) , It must be decided with proper consultations with all civil
society Stakeholders ( Teachers Orgaisations, students, & free Software
community ) associated with that Project.
This MoU deserves a bad name because of it is an Untransperent
undemocratic decision
> Probably, the community wants to retain the contracts from the
> IT at SCHOOL project?
FUD again!! You are trying to link up the concerns of Free software
Community to Money Matters and undermining the concerns by putting the
money on top of that. Which completely not relevant here.
> Quite fine with me if you do not take any mone from the IT at SCHOOL
> project directly. That means, on government's records, you are not
> involved with the project. Therefore, the government is perfectly
> justified is not consulting you before entering into the MoU.
Money Decides everything in your point of view. govt is much better in
this case. earlier they called up volunteers for GNU/Linux in District
level . That list is available with schools itself.
I pointed It above On the second issue. Consultation with all civil
society stakeholders associated with any project before taking decisions
must be a mandate of Free software Community.
The model systems & laws are already there on non-digital world. Before
planning Big Projects that affect lives & livelihood of people there
must be Public hearing based on an Environment Impact Assesement.
We are demanding the same in Digital Era. Just see a similar demand by
Fisherfolks (I got it right now)
http://www.petitiononline.com/cmz/petition.html
> That is why I repeatedly say, do not work for the government free of
> cost. Do any work free of cost for the government free of cost, and
> you can be assured that it will go down the town/village/district
> drain.
The Free software adoption of IT at school was not a boon given by
Government. It was a civil society campaign for Essential freedoms in
Computing Led by Various Individuals & Groups (including KSTA, FSF-I
etc). Who pays for the campaign?
Free Software Adoption in schools helped them (at least in my village)
to link it up the expertise in society in a major way. In Kerala
scenario Schools & Libraries are the social space in which people meet &
discuss. This helped a lot of people to adopt free software (and a lot
of people bought new systems too) and a lot of youth (who came out from
schools) become free software users. Free software exits in society
because of its strong social linkages. That society will surely support
a free software developer for developing the solution they want. I am
not subscribing ur "drain" theory on market equations
>
> Free software is not free masala dosa.
I agree. Both r different. But is not only regarding cost. One is to
finish your Thirst for freedom & other is an optional and need is
related to the conditions of your stomach
> > This is a usual problem for people thinking in Terms of Market &
> > Money than Social Means of work. We work for Free Software &
> > language Computing Mainly Because of Thinking Social Benefits of
> > It. The social cause is the motivating factor here. Not Money. We
> > know that people will support us too if we can address the social
> > needs.
>
> Anivar, I know that you do not care much about money. But, do not deny
> that you were involved with the space-kerala.org / FSF India. When you
> criticise actions by the government [apparently] in favour of Free
> software, but against the existing interests which support the present
> day activities of the governments, I will need to scrutinise your
> claims very closely.
FSF India & space-kerala are not a part of the state. Those are civil
society organisations. So how it matters!!..
Self Scrutinising will be also good at this moment I feel.
> If you have not been financially involved with the space-kerala.org
> and / or FSF India, I apologise about the money part, else my
> statements stand.
I am not getting your point. I professionally Involved with FSF-I &
SPACE . Apologies accepted.
But dont try to put mud on Organisations & People working to promote
free software in the state on behalf of your undisclosed Personal
agenda's or interests.
- --
Anivar Aravind
moving Republic
Peringavu.P.O
Thrissur-18
Kerala
http://anivar.movingrepublic.org/about
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGaP3bF+jWtLmEaycRAjFyAJ9viPmUQh6RyIyhAJPZ43tb0WfZ/QCfU8EH
yVnMDTe6dqhJsG7YqtPMGOQ=
=YmEC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Debian-in-workers
mailing list