[Debian-in-workers] Pending Changes todo for Package Maintainers

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Vasudev Kamath (kamathvasudev at gmail.com):
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Christian PERRIER <bubulle at debian.org> wrote:
> <snipped>
> >> So what will be other best alternative?
> >
> > Maybe fonts-lohit-beng-<fontname> for each of these?
> 
> Ok that sounds good so we will rename Assamese font to
> fonts-lohit-beng-assamese or fonts-lohit-beng-as. Please suggest which
> will be better so that Muneeb can finish his work.


-beng-assamese seems more appropriate to me (less cryptic), so the
other package will be -beng-bengali.

Still, upstream has indeed strange choices : creating a font for a
*language* while a font is more related to a *script* is something
really strange (and, from what I read in this thread, the same
happened for Kashmiri, with a "Kashmiri" font while the language is
indeed usually written in Devanagari).

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-in-workers/attachments/20111114/5dd6f0bc/attachment-0001.pgp>