[Debian-l10n-devel] Porting the mail interface, or not (ddtp.debian.org)

[David Prévot]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Le 29/07/2012 09:51, Martin Eberhard Schauer a écrit :

> At present I don't see the improvement in changing to PO files for the
> DDTSS.
> But perhaps others have a better idea of the possible consequences.

It would help *a*lot* for consistency among translations, allowing to
propose translations for parts that already exist (e.g. binary packages
from the same source often get identical parts, and they are not always
translated the same way), either via the use of a local compendium, or
even better, one included in the DDTSS host…

It would allow to use already known and efficient tools for translators.

It would also allow to use the same workflow for translation and review
that is already in place for debconf, program and documentation.

It would made some of us happy (yes that count too ;-).

Cheers

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=RdNW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----