[med-svn] r184 - trunk/community/debtags

[Charles Plessy]

Author: charles-guest
Date: 2007-01-13 02:24:03 +0100 (Sat, 13 Jan 2007)
New Revision: 184

Modified:
   trunk/community/debtags/tags
Log:
Let us think and discuss a bit more...

Modified: trunk/community/debtags/tags
===================================================================
--- trunk/community/debtags/tags	2007-01-12 16:01:52 UTC (rev 183)
+++ trunk/community/debtags/tags	2007-01-13 01:24:03 UTC (rev 184)
@@ -2,28 +2,44 @@
 field::biology:sequence:dna
 field::biology:sequence:rna
 field::biology:sequence:protein
-field::biology:structure
+# I would rather move the :sequence tags to the works-with:: facet -- Charles
+field::biology:structure # or field::biology:structural ? -- Charles
+field::biology:molecular
+field::biology:evolution
 field::biology:interaction
 field::biology:genomics
 field::biology:proteomics
 field::biology:metabolomics
+field::biology:transcriptiomics
+field::biology:systems
 field::medicine:imaging
 field::medicine:practice
 field::medicine:odontology
 field::medicine:his
 use::comparison
 use::comparison:alignment
+use::experiment
+use::experiment:molecular-biology
 use::measuring
 hardware::input:dmm
 works-with::device
+works-with::sequence:nucleic
+works-with::sequence:protein
 works-with-format::biology:fasta
 works-with-format::biology:aln
 works-with-format::biology:pdb
 works-with-format::biology:embl
 works-with-format::biology:affy:dat
 works-with-format::biology:affy:cel
-works-with-format::medicine::practice::xDT
-works-with-format::medicine:DICOM
+# I would rather move the above formats in the ::plaintext subfacet -- Charles
+works-with-format::plaintext:aln
+works-with-format::plaintext:embl
+works-with-format::plaintext:fasta
+works-with-format::plaintext:pdb
+works-with-format::plaintext:affy:dat
+works-with-format::plaintext:affy:cel
+works-with-format::medicine:practice:xDT
+works-with-format::medicine:DICOM # or works-with-format::dicom ? -- Charles
 # an earlier idea of mine to separate different
 # kinds of prediction methods - appreciated?
 # "use" rather than "made-of"?