[med-svn] r5572 - trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg

[Steffen Möller]

Author: moeller
Date: 2010-12-09 21:15:57 +0000 (Thu, 09 Dec 2010)
New Revision: 5572

Modified:
   trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg/paper-text.tex
Log:
Changed last paragraph.


Modified: trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg/paper-text.tex
===================================================================
--- trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg/paper-text.tex	2010-12-09 21:08:55 UTC (rev 5571)
+++ trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg/paper-text.tex	2010-12-09 21:15:57 UTC (rev 5572)
@@ -763,11 +763,11 @@
 
 \section{Conclusions}
 
-We have shown that there is a considerable heterogeneous shape of Free
-Software for medical care even if some fields like micro biology are
+The real of Free Software for medical care is very heterogeneous,
+even if some fields like micro biology are
 better covered than others. The continuous updates of data and the
 addition of novel important tools for a general medical environment
-cannot be performed by a single maintainer. The adherence to a policy
+cannot be performed by a single individual. The adherence to a policy
 and the sharing of maintenance are basic technologies to allow
 inter-institutional software projects of different kind in health
 care.
@@ -781,9 +781,24 @@
 packages that already serve their needs or may be adapted
 respectively.
 
-For Debian GNU/Linux to become the race-horse for Free Software in
-health care, further important software which is listed at
+% Debian is not important, the Free Software is
+%For Debian GNU/Linux to become the race-horse for Free Software in
+%health care.
+
+All that said about Debian, at the end of the day it is the Freeness
+of the software that is important. OpenSuSE and Fedora, with
+slight variations, have adopted much of the principles that Debian
+spearheaded. We still need to advance mechanisms like the tool alien
+\marginpar{ref to Alien?} to work together as Linux users, maybe along
+the lines of the collaboration between Debian and Ubuntu. And we all,
+users, packagers and developers, need to understand more about cross
+platform developments that also includes MacOS X and Windows.
+
+% ???? I think this should go, it is a bad last setence
+Further important software which is listed at
 \printurl{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open_source_healthcare_software}{Wikipedia
   list of open source healthcare software}\cite{wikipediaoslist:2008}
 like for instance OpenVista\cite{openvista:2008} and other enterprise
 grade health care information systems has to be packaged for Debian.
+
+% What about an Acknowledgement section?