[med-svn] r5596 - trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg

Yaroslav Halchenko yoh at alioth.debian.org
Fri Dec 10 13:42:41 UTC 2010


Author: yoh
Date: 2010-12-10 13:42:40 +0000 (Fri, 10 Dec 2010)
New Revision: 5596

Modified:
   trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg/paper-text.tex
Log:
fixed use of printurls -- those should come without protocol definition, e.g. http://

Modified: trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg/paper-text.tex
===================================================================
--- trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg/paper-text.tex	2010-12-10 13:36:32 UTC (rev 5595)
+++ trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg/paper-text.tex	2010-12-10 13:42:40 UTC (rev 5596)
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@
 -- are now dormant.
 A few random examples for interesting projects with no visible release
 for longer than five years are:
- \printurl{http://sourceforge.net/projects/freepm/}{FreePM},
- \printurl{http://www.txoutcome.org/}{OIO},
- \printurl{http://sourceforge.net/projects/odontolinux/}{OdontoLinux!}
+ \printurl{sourceforge.net/projects/freepm/}{FreePM},
+ \printurl{www.txoutcome.org/}{OIO},
+ \printurl{sourceforge.net/projects/odontolinux/}{OdontoLinux!}
  which was even included in Debian formerly.
 Those failed to follow two basic principles of Free Software: care for a solid user base
 and recruit qualified developers from it. This is a difficult task that becomes even more difficult with 
@@ -488,9 +488,9 @@
 above).
 
 An effort similar to \DebianMed exists in Fedora as
-\printurl{http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/FedoraMedical}{FedoraMedical
+\printurl{fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/FedoraMedical}{FedoraMedical
   SIG (Special Interest Group)} and in openSUSE as
-\printurl{http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Medical}{openSUSE Medical}.
+\printurl{en.opensuse.org/Portal:Medical}{openSUSE Medical}.
 Both projects share the same idea of putting medical applications inside a
 larger distribution instead of trying to do the work of the
 distributor themselves.  The
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@
 
 Looking beyond Linux distributions there is also FreeBSD.  The ports
 collection also contains a versatile
-\printurl{http://www.freebsd.org/ports/biology.html}{collection of
+\printurl{www.freebsd.org/ports/biology.html}{collection of
   biological software}.  The remarkable fact here is not the
 underlying operating system (you can easily have Debian with a FreeBSD
 kernel with Debian 6.0) but rather the fact that the same strategy to
@@ -783,15 +783,15 @@
 on a daily basis and includes some meta information to \emph{e.g.} point to
 relevant scientific publications and the description of the
 packages in this task.  The output of the project can be easily \marginpar{just have a regular reference to the URL}
-viewed at \printurl{http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/}{the
+viewed at \printurl{debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/}{the
   tasks page of \DebianMed}.
 
 For the comfort of the user these pages are translated (if the
-\printurl{http://ddtp.debian.net/}{Debian Description Translation
+\printurl{ddtp.debian.net/}{Debian Description Translation
   Project} has provided translations), include screenshots from
-\printurl{http://screenshots.debian.net/}{screenshots.debian.net} if
+\printurl{screenshots.debian.net/}{screenshots.debian.net} if
 available, give information about the usage of a package by querying
-\printurl{http://popcon.debian.org/}{Debian Popularity Contest}
+\printurl{popcon.debian.org/}{Debian Popularity Contest}
 results and inform about versions packaged for Debian as well as a
 notification about new releases.  Moreover, the visitor of
 these pages gets an easy option to provide a screenshot or a missing
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@
 
 There are also quality assurance tools developed; for instance there is
 an overview of
-\printurl{http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/bugs/}{all bugs
+\printurl{debian-med.alioth.debian.org/bugs/}{all bugs
   concerning the packages in \DebianMed}.
 
 By providing this kind of tools for other Blends as well \DebianMed
@@ -881,7 +881,7 @@
 %  Debian developers can provide packages which are checked and
 %  uploaded by official maintainers.  There is no point in keeping good
 %  quality softwares outside of Debian.
-%\item \printurl{http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/}{The tasks
+%\item \printurl{debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/}{The tasks
 %  page of \DebianMed} mentioned above does not only contain the work
 %  that was done -- it contains also a nicely formated list which
 %  projects would be interesting to reach the final goal to cover each
@@ -957,7 +957,7 @@
 % FIXME: Should be moved to a "links section" where we also mention
 %        MedFloss.org
 %Further important software which is listed at
-%\printurl{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open_source_healthcare_software}{Wikipedia
+%\printurl{en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open_source_healthcare_software}{Wikipedia
 %  list of open source healthcare software}\cite{wikipediaoslist:2008}
 %like for instance OpenVista\cite{openvista:2008} and other enterprise
 %grade health care information systems has to be packaged for Debian.




More information about the debian-med-commit mailing list