[med-svn] r4606 - trunk/packages/R/r-cran-medadherence/trunk/debian

Andreas Tille tille at alioth.debian.org
Fri Feb 5 14:10:40 UTC 2010


Author: tille
Date: 2010-02-05 14:10:39 +0000 (Fri, 05 Feb 2010)
New Revision: 4606

Modified:
   trunk/packages/R/r-cran-medadherence/trunk/debian/changelog
   trunk/packages/R/r-cran-medadherence/trunk/debian/copyright
Log:
Next try for initial upload


Modified: trunk/packages/R/r-cran-medadherence/trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/packages/R/r-cran-medadherence/trunk/debian/changelog	2010-02-05 08:24:23 UTC (rev 4605)
+++ trunk/packages/R/r-cran-medadherence/trunk/debian/changelog	2010-02-05 14:10:39 UTC (rev 4606)
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
-r-cran-medadherence (1.01-1) unstable; urgency=low
+r-cran-medadherence (1.02-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
-  * Initial release (closes: #557200).
+  * Initial release (closes: #557200)
+    Remark about previous rejection:
+     - The data file in question was removed.
+     - Upstream forgot to include the GPL COPYRIGHT file but
+       has given explicite permission to include it in a private 
+       mail (see copyright file).
 
  -- Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org>  Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:38:39 +0100

Modified: trunk/packages/R/r-cran-medadherence/trunk/debian/copyright
===================================================================
--- trunk/packages/R/r-cran-medadherence/trunk/debian/copyright	2010-02-05 08:24:23 UTC (rev 4605)
+++ trunk/packages/R/r-cran-medadherence/trunk/debian/copyright	2010-02-05 14:10:39 UTC (rev 4606)
@@ -19,6 +19,17 @@
 	 
 	You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 	along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+Comment: The upstream file is lacking an explicite COPYRIGHT file but I've
+ go the following mail from the author:
+ .
+ On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 10:47:07AM -0700, Xiangyang Ye <yexyang at gmail.com> wrote:
+  Is it OK for you add the file GPLv2 (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt)
+  in the tarball given the package was developed under GPL version 2? I am
+  comfortable for this if it's acceptable.
+  I promise that I will add this text file in the future revision.
+ .
+ I think there is no need to formally change the tarball if this permission
+ is explicitely given.
 
 Comment: On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU Public
  License version 2 can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'.




More information about the debian-med-commit mailing list