[med-svn] vcfanno - any insights in how to address all these go packages?

[Steffen Möller]

Hello,

Is there anything special to consider for packaging go libraries?

When brentp implements a buffered reader for go, something rather
essential I tent to think, is the proper package name then

xopen
brentp-xopen
golang-xopen or
golang-brentp-xopen?

Should we somehow coordinate who addresses the packaging of what? Some
GO aficionado here who would like to adopt them all?

Best,

Steffen

On 28.05.19 10:22, Steffen Möller wrote:
> GitLab
>
> # *debian/changelog*
> <https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/vcfanno/commit/a8ad5a8157284425a698ec9168dde78939b2b733#9c96da0e9f91d7d8937b69b524702c106258f0d1>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 	1
>   vcfanno (0.3.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> 2 	2
>
> 3 	3
>   * Initial release (Closes: #<bug>)
>
> 	4
> +
>
> 	5
> +[Steffen Moeller]
>
> 	6
> +
>
> 	7
> +* Far from being releaseable, requiring
>
> 	8
> +"github.com/BurntSushi/toml"
>
> 	9
> +"github.com/biogo/hts/bgzf"
>
> 	10
> +"github.com/brentp/irelate"
>
> 	11
> +"github.com/brentp/irelate/interfaces"
>
> 	12
> +"github.com/brentp/irelate/parsers"
>
> 	13
> +"github.com/brentp/vcfanno/api"
>
> 	14
> +"github.com/brentp/vcfanno/shared"
>
> 	15
> +"github.com/brentp/vcfgo"
>
> 	16
> +"github.com/brentp/xopen"
> 4 	17
>
> 5 	18
>   -- Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org> Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:48:54 +0200
>
> 	19
> +
>
>
> 	\ No newline at end of file
>
>