[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#533976: bioperl test failures not reproduced with cowbuilder.

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 22/06/09 at 09:15 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > > t/SearchIO/blastxml..........................dubious
> > > 	Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
> > > DIED. FAILED tests 148-298
> > > 	Failed 151/298 tests, 49.33% okay
> > > t/SeqIO/bsml_sax.............................dubious
> > > 	Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
> > > DIED. FAILED tests 2-15
> > > 	Failed 14/15 tests, 6.67% okay
> > > Failed 2/318 test scripts. 165/16485 subtests failed.
> > > Files=318, Tests=16485, 172 wallclock secs (81.32 cusr +  6.65 csys = 87.97 CPU)
> > > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 255
> > 
> > The full build log is available from:
> >    http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2009/06/20/bioperl_1.6.0-2_lsid64.buildlog
> 
> Bonjour Lucas,
> 
> thanks a lot for your QA efforts, they really impress me.
> 
> In the case of the above errors, I did not reproduce them in a Sid cowbuilder
> this morning. The two tests have in common XML parsing… Do you think that there
> could be things preinstalled in your chroot that makes the parsing fail? I have
> not found significant differences in the list of installed build-dependancies.

Hi Charles,

It seems that the test make use of internet access, which should not be
considered available.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |