[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#571673: Bug#571673: upstream pvrg-jpeg-etb.patch seems to differ from debian's

[Mathieu Malaterre]

The patch has been split into 4 :

 jpeg.1.patch  lexer.l.patch  marker_o_rdwr.patch  and  pvrg-jpeg-etb.patch

This was easier for me to maintain.

Let me know if this is a debian policy violation, or what os needed to
make this clear.

Thanks

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer
<christoph.anton.mitterer at physik.uni-muenchen.de> wrote:
> Package: pvrg-jpeg
> Version: 1.2.1+dfsg1-1
> Severity: minor
>
> Hi.
>
> The upstream version of pvrg-jpeg-etb.patch
> (http://www.panix.com/~eli/jpeg/pvrg-jpeg-etb.patch.gz) seems to differ from
> what is shipped with Debian,... is this an accident or could you please
> explain why?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
>  APT prefers unstable
>  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-heisenberg (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
> Locale: LANG=en_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
> Versions of packages pvrg-jpeg depends on:
> ii  libc6                         2.10.2-6   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared
> lib
>
> pvrg-jpeg recommends no packages.
>
> Versions of packages pvrg-jpeg suggests:
> ii  libjpeg-progs                8-2.1       Programs for manipulating JPEG
> fil
> ii  netpbm                       2:10.0-12.1 Graphics conversion tools
> between
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
>



-- 
Mathieu