[Debian-med-packaging] r6920 - in trunk/packages/mgltools: dejavu/trunk/debian mslib/trunk/debian networkeditor/trunk/debian pyautodock/trunk/debian pybabel/trunk/debian qslimlib/trunk/debian support/trunk/debian symserv/trunk/debian viewerframework/trunk/debian vision/trunk/debian vision/trunk/debian/patches volume/trunk/debian

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Thorsten,

On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:52:47PM +0000, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Author: alteholz-guest
> Date: 2011-06-06 17:52:47 +0000 (Mon, 06 Jun 2011)
> New Revision: 6920
> 
> Added:
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/dejavu/trunk/debian/mgltools-dejavu.lintian-overrides
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/mslib/trunk/debian/watch
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/networkeditor/trunk/debian/mgltools-networkeditor.lintian-overrides
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/pyautodock/trunk/debian/mgltools-pyautodock.lintian-overrides
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/pybabel/trunk/debian/mgltools-pybabel.lintian-overrides
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/support/trunk/debian/mgltools-support.lintian-overrides
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/symserv/trunk/debian/mgltools-symserv.lintian-overrides
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/viewerframework/trunk/debian/mgltools-viewerframework.lintian-overrides
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/vision/trunk/debian/mgltools-vision.lintian-overrides
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/vision/trunk/debian/patches/series
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/volume/trunk/debian/mgltools-volume.lintian-overrides
> Modified:
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/mslib/trunk/debian/control
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/pyautodock/trunk/debian/control
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/qslimlib/trunk/debian/control
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/qslimlib/trunk/debian/rules
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/vision/trunk/debian/patches/unversioned_shebang.patch
>    trunk/packages/mgltools/vision/trunk/debian/rules
> Log:
> some lintian calming
> ...

Thanks for your work on the mgltools packages.  I guess you will have
noticed that some of these have some remaining RC bugs which are quite
easy to fix following the scheme I used for other mgltools packages
featuring the same bug concerning Python migration.

However, I wonder whether it might be a good idea to use a single source
package (as far as I have heard upstream is providing exactly this) and
build a multi-binary package from it.  While this means some more work
when doing the initial packaging it would have gathered only one bug of
this type instead of a lot of those.

What do you think?

Kind regards and thanks for your work on this

       Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de