[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#625622: Subject: libbam-dev: additional header files for package
Alex Mestiashvili
alex at biotec.tu-dresden.de
Sat May 7 14:53:43 UTC 2011
On 05/07/2011 11:18 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:41:09AM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili a écrit :
>
>> The only problem I see is that sam.h , bam.h ... have very short
>> and generic names .
>>
>> for example: there are already packages with such headers :
>>
>> libadplug-dev: /usr/include/adplug/bam.h
>> libcorosync-dev: /usr/include/corosync/sam.h
>>
>> So I think it is better to have samtools headers in a separate directory .
>>
> Dear Alex,
>
> I will upload samtools 0.1.16 soon and can take the opportunity
> to move the libbam-dev headers.
>
> How about /usr/bin/samtools as suggested by J. Bonfield ?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
Dear Charles ,
That would be great , but you probably meant /usr/includes/samtools ?
This sound good for me .
Should I CC to maintainers of Bio::Samtools ? this package also will
be affected .
Best regards ,
Alex
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list