[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#680798: sitplus: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libpoco-dev

Andreas Tille andreas at an3as.eu
Mon Jul 9 08:41:12 UTC 2012


Hi,

I wonder what this problem might be sitplus as well as libpoco-dev are
in unstable.  I can not see what action needs to be done here.  Please
explain.

Kind regards

        Andreas.

On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 07:01:32PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: sitplus
> Version: 1.0.3-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> 
> Hi,
> 
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
> 
> Relevant part:
> > ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
> > │ Install sitplus build dependencies (apt-based resolver)                      │
> > └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
> > 
> > Installing build dependencies
> > Reading package lists...
> > Building dependency tree...
> > Reading state information...
> > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > or been moved out of Incoming.
> > The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> > 
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >  sbuild-build-depends-sitplus-dummy : Depends: libpoco-dev but it is not going to be installed
> > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> > apt-get failed.
> 
> The full build log is available from:
>    http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/07/08/sitplus_1.0.3-3_unstable.log
> 
> A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
> http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
> 
> About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
> Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
> failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging

-- 
http://fam-tille.de





More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list