[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#689951: Package appears to be non-free

[Emmanuel Promayon]

Dear Andreas,

> I personally would be happy if you would decide for the later because
> in addition you get a lot of other information and how people might
> deal together with other problems.
After my answer yesterday I subscribed to the CamiTK package only, but 
reading your answer, I just reconsidered and subscribed to debian-med 
mailing-list as it seems the best option to improve my learning curve.

> In this case would CamITK remain in *main*!  Considering the fact that
> you know all these facts - would you volunteer to do the needed steps?
I am on a tight schedule this week. Do you think it could be ok if:
- I remove the licence offending part of the CamiTK source for the 
moment (the tetgen plugin) today
- I do a better work at the beginning of next week where I could 
reintroduce the tetgen plugin but using the tetgen debian package 
instead and correct the two other bugs properly (#689021 and 690830)

For #690830 there is a patch proposal and there is also a another way 
that I would like to try first (that will probably have better compiler 
specific/multi-arch support).

Thanks again, all your help is really appreciated.

-- 
Emmanuel Promayon
UJF-Grenoble 1, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 (équipe GMCAO)
Institut de l'Ingénierie de l'Information de Santé
Faculté de Médecine - 38706 La Tronche cedex - France
Tel. +33/0 456 52 00 03 - Fax. +33/0 456 52 00 55 - B7