[Debian-med-packaging] r-cran-evaluate_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Paul R. Tagliamonte]

Hurm. I'm a bit on the fence about this one; but I guess that's OK if
that's how "GPL" is understood to whatever's reading this format.

Upstream should have a copy of the license terms that it's under in the
source regardless (otherwise it's technically a violation of the license)

Feel free to re-upload. I'd likely let it through now that I understand
that this is how that is understood.

Cheers,
  Paul


On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 04:00:33AM +0000, Paul Richards Tagliamonte wrote:
> >
> > Howdy maintainer,
> >
> > Thanks for your work so far,
> >
> > Can you please show me where you found which version of the GPL that this
> > software was under? I can only see "GPL" in the description.
>
> Its homepage
>
>    http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/evaluate/
>
> License:        GPL-2 | GPL-3 [expanded from: GPL]
>
>
> I'd consider this as GPL-2 or any later version of this license.
>
> Kind regards
>
>        Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>



-- 
:wq
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20131228/d34f662d/attachment.html>