[Debian-med-packaging] [Health-dev] GNU Health in Debian

Thu May 9 21:10:52 UTC 2013

Hi,

2013/5/8 Emilien Klein <emilien+debian at klein.st>

> Hi Mathias,
>
> 2013/5/7 Mathias Behrle <mathiasb at m9s.biz>:
> > * Mathias Behrle: " Re: [tryton-debian] Dependency on
> tryton-modules-stock-lot
> >   for new version of gnuhealth" (Sat, 4 May 2013 01:08:27 +0200):
> >
> [...]
> >
> > Some more questions wrt to GNU Health:
> >
> > 1) AFAIS version 2.0 of the GNU Health modules is announced to run on
> Tryton
> >    version 2.8. Do you currently work on porting them to 2.8? In what
> way are
> >    you related to the GNU health project?
>
> The plan is to package GNU Health 2.0 when it comes out, and upload it
> to Debian Sid (this will be the first GNU Health release to hit Sid,
> as currently we only uploaded to Experimental).
> This is dependent on the different Tryton 2.8 modules being available
> in Sid as well, namely the stock lot module you have been working on.
> Do you have anyone in particular that could review your RFS on
> bug#706957? I see you've included Andreas Tille (member of the Debian
> Med team) in your RFS bug report, has Andreas sponsored previous
> Tryton packages for you?
>
> With regards to my relation to the GNU health project: I am working
> inside the Debian Med team to get it packaged in Debian (and
> derivatives). I have contributed a bit on the GNU Health wiki (namely
> installation instructions/screenshots), but [not yet] with code. In
> short: I am not directly affiliated with the project.
>
> > 2) I already examined some time ago the health modules related to their
> fitness
> >    for their inclusion in Debian. I also talked with Sebastián Marró from
> >    Thymbra about this subject at last TUL in Liège/Belgium. I see, that
> in the
> >    meantime a complete new set of icons was created under Creative
> Commons
> >    Attribution Share-Alike (CC-BY-SA) v3.0, which is great!
> >    I would like to know the feelings and interests of the GNU Health
> Devs about
> >    the inclusion in Debian.
>
> I do hope they are enthusiastic ;)
>

For sure that it would be great to have GNU Health in Debian.

> The packaging of GNU Health in new Linux distributions (Archlinux and
> Parabola) was mentionned as part of the main changes in the 2.0
> release date announcement [0]. Luis also congratulated the
> announcement of the Parabola packaging [1].
>
> [0] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/health/2013-04/msg00043.html
> [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/health-dev/2013-04/msg00022.html
>
> >    The preliminary summary of my last check is the following:
> >
> >    * From the licensing perspective we now have GPL-3+ and CC-BY-SA v3.0
> for
> >      thehttp://lists.virtual-things.org/mailman/listinfo/tryton-debianwhole
> >      tree, no problems here.
> >    * The concatenation of all health modules in just one VCS repository
> is a
> >      little bit unusual. Of course it can ease the handling, when it
> comes to
> >      provide an installation tarball for the method from sources [2]. But
> >      perhaps it could not scale in the future.
>
> The way I see it: all GNU Health, packages are installed, but you will
> only activate the ones you want to use for your Healthcare System
> (that's done in the Modules section directly within Tryton).
>
> >      Nevertheless this is no serious obstacle, since the releases are
> uploaded
> >      to pypi and can be obtained separately from there.
> >    * One point still not solved seems to be the integration of the
> translation
> >      done at [3]. It would be good to pull in the locales at release
> time. Are
> >      there any plans to do so?
>
> Good question for the GNU Health developers. I believe the
> translations used to be included, but were explicitly removed from a
> previous GNU Health version. It does indeed strike me as something
> that is not usual, as translations are most often contained in the
> release tarballs.
>

We are working on this topic, to download the translations from Transifex
at release time and include them in the modules.

> > I would be happy to get some feedback on those questions. Further
> discussion
> > could preferably be moved to some public list [4][5][6][7].
>
> I have included the Debian Med and GNU Health dev lists.
>
> > Regards,
> > Mathias
> >
> > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706957
> > [2] http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/GNU_Health/Installation
> > [3] https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/GNU_Health/
> > [4] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/health
> > [5] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/health-dev
> > [6] http://lists.virtual-things.org/mailman/listinfo/tryton-debian
> > [7] http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/
> >
> > --
> >
> >     Mathias Behrle
> >     MBSolutions
> >     Gilgenmatten 10 A
> >     D-79114 Freiburg
> >
> >     Tel: +49(761)471023
> >     Fax: +49(761)4770816
> >     http://m9s.biz
> >     UStIdNr: DE 142009020
> >     PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0x8405BBF6
>
>    +Emilien
>
>
Regards

-- 
Sebastián Marró
*thymbr**@*
Converging Ideas for Emerging Realities
www.thymbra.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20130509/df25d2c1/attachment.html>