[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#726801: Bug#726801: biomaj: fails to install with Recommends enabled

Olivier Sallou olivier.sallou at irisa.fr
Wed Nov 6 08:51:38 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


On 11/05/2013 06:08 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:16:31 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
>>>> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to
install. As
>>>> per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
>>>> a release, thus the severity.
>> actually I observed the problem while testing biomaj-watcher_1.2.1-1 in
>> contrib, but the failure was already while installing its dependencies.
>
> I know, that's why I tried both :)
> 
>>> IOW: I can't reproduce the installation failure (amd64 sid chroot,
>>> DEBCONF_FRONTEND=noninteractive), neither with biomaj-watcher nor
>>> with biomaj, neither with --with-recommends nor with
>>> --without-recommends.
>>
>> and in that logfile (that is already attached to the bugreport)
>> I have
>>
>>   Setting up ca-certificates-java (20130815) ...
>>   done.
>>   Setting up openjdk-7-jre-headless:i386 (7u25-2.3.12-4) ...
>>   update-alternatives: using
>> /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-i386/jre/bin/java to provide /usr/bin/java
>> (java) in auto mode
>>
>>
>> ***after*** the biomaj failure - so there was no java, yet.
>> Looks like dependencies are missing somewhere.
>
> Which is weird since biomaj Depends: default-jre | java6-runtime.
>
> But yes, something might be wrong somewhere, even if I couldn't
> reproduce it manually :)
> (I have vague memories about openjdk-something 6 vs. 7 and
> update-alternatives.)
biomaj already passed piuparts test in the past and dependencies did not
change.
There were a few changes in postinst file but only to add a few
test/change commands. Nothing that would prevent java command.
In the meanwhile, default java switched from java6 to java7 but I never
saw any install at install with both.

Olivier
>
>
> Oh, and I don't find the lines you quoted above in the log in
> #726801.
Same,  :-)
>
>> PS: the logfile contains the full piuparts command line I used, look at
>> the top.
>
> Yup; I'll try to have another look in the next days.
>
> Cheers,
> gregor
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
>
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging

- -- 
Olivier Sallou
IRISA / University of Rennes 1
Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE
Tel: 02.99.84.71.95

gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=sBzb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20131106/60c0a679/attachment.html>


More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list