[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#756780: Status bowtie + tophat (Was: [Help] Need help for architecture specific code)
Charles Plessy
plessy at debian.org
Sun Aug 24 07:14:09 UTC 2014
Le Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 07:30:21PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> What can we do to get tophat and bowtie into testing?
>
> tophat:
> 1. tophat only Recommends: bowtie2 | bowtie or
> 2. tophat Architecture: amd64 kfreebsd-amd64
> I think 1. is the better option
Hi Andreas,
In my understanding, it is not possible to run TopHat without Bowtie (version 1
or 2). Therefore, the “Depends” relationship is the most appropriate.
Regarding the migration to Testing, it looks like both bowtie2 and bowtie must
be installable to satisfy “bowtie2 | bowtie”, so we need to adapt ourselves to
this constraint. Here are two possible solutions to the problem :
1. bowtie2 and bowtie provide a virtual “bowtie-aligner”, and tophat
depends on “bowtie2 | bowtie-aligner”.
2. tophat depends on bowtie2 only.
Given that bowtie and bowtie2 can be co-installed, and given that most users
will want to use Bowtie 2 with TopHat, how about solution 2 ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list