[Debian-med-packaging] debian/upstream vs. debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp

[Charles Plessy]

Le Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 05:06:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> 
> While I perfectly agree that it would have been the correct way to
> discuss claiming parts of the namespace first (heck, even if you do
> discuss changes for uscan at length like I did for Files-Excluded people
> raise their hands afterwards that should be implemented differently) I
> would volunteer to *help* (not lead) in a transition which means
> 
>   * reuploading files of Debian Med (and if needed of Debian Science
>     and DebiChem)
>   * working on the needed changes for UDD machine readable files gatherer
> 
> However, my prefered solution for this problem would to start an open
> discussion on debian-devel for opinions about a potential new name for
> the signature file.  This would have two advantages:
> 
>   1. We might find some better consensus which could make a stressfull
>      transition superfluous
>   2. Readers of the list would hopefully *learn* about both things
>      (the signature file as well as the metadata file)

Hello James,

what is your take on this ?  Will you start a discussion on debian-devel ?

Have a nice Sunday,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan