[Debian-med-packaging] debian/upstream vs. debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp

[James McCoy]

On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:50:11AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> thanks for your patch.  While this is welcome I guess this is the least
> of Charles' problems.  I guess he was more concerned about the umegaya
> package which probably needs some more love than the simple shell
> script.  We also need to fix the UDD importer (but this is similarly
> easy to do like the patch you provided) and lintian check for upstream
> metadata files.

I'm willing to offer more help.

> I keep on wondering if we are doing the right thing to not include
> debian-devel into this discussion.

I did -- <20140207044923.GF3325 at cerberus.jamessan.com>.

-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <jamessan at debian.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20140207/52ec56b3/attachment.sig>