[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#740705: Please incorportate ubuntu patches
Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfranco at yahoo.it
Sun Mar 9 08:58:50 UTC 2014
> Il Sabato 8 Marzo 2014 23:19, Steve M. Robbins <steve at sumost.ca> ha scritto:
> > On March 6, 2014 07:29:31 AM Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
>> Ok, can you then please sponsor a package for me? I can fix this bug, also
>> #740628 and push on mentors.
>
> I can do that. Please send a follow-up to the bug when your work is ready. I
> (or another debian-med team member) will act on it.
>
Here you are :)
https://mentors.debian.net/package/insighttoolkit
I kept changes as minimal as possible
>
>> > Is there some reason you can't use ITK v4?
>>
>> The main reason is:
>
> [...limited architectures...]
>
>> many packages that have been successfully built with the v3 won't build
>> anymore against v4, so the rationale is "use 4 on amd64 and i386,
> switch to
>> v3 for other archs".
>
> OK. But you do understand that in future this will no longer be an option
> because, at some point, v3 will be removed from the archive in favour of v4
> that is now in Testing.
>
Ack.
>> I don't know if you have an hint for building them against v4 (removing
> the
>> package from ftpmaster will let the package reach testing I know)
>
> If you want to build a package that requires ITK, at present you have two
> options: (a) build only for the two ITK-supported architectures, or (b) stay
> with v3. There's a discussion going on now in debian-med regarding a third
> option: restoring architectures to v4.
That will be nice for the long term indeed, evenmore because v3 has some problems fixed in v4 I heard from nifti2dicom maintainer, in the meanwhile I think the fallback is the easiest way to let the packagenifti2dicom reach testing
>
> Regards,
>
> -Steve
Best regards,
Gianfranco
>
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list