[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#793187: arb: FTBFS with gcc 4.9.2+

[Andreas Beckmann]

On 2015-12-09 17:22, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> hmmm, I wonder in how far a lob popcon non-free package is relevant for
> Jessie point releases.  IMHO this creates more work for all involved
> parties than it is worth the issue.  Please correct me if I'm wrong and
> I'll do what needs to be done.

So far the SRM accepted fixes for FTBFS(-like) bugs in jessie (or the
non-free appendix to jessie) without questioning.
If we consider some packages not worth fixing RC bugs in stable, perhaps
they shouldn't have been part of stable (or stable/non-free) in the
first place?
Yes, it's a trivial fix and probably noone will run into the problem in
real world setups, but where should the line be drawn?


Andreas