[Debian-med-packaging] Continuing with phybin (Was: Packaging my first haskell package)
Andreas Tille
andreas at an3as.eu
Fri Dec 18 08:31:38 UTC 2015
Hi Joachim,
thanks to your very quick reaction. I noticed that libghc-text was also
accepted quickly by ftpmaster and so I tried my luck to continue with
phybin[1].
The remaining problem was that libghc-text was pinned to version
libghc-text-dev (>= 0.11), libghc-text-dev (<< 0.12)
I naively dropped the (<< 0.12) restriction and patched phybin.cabal
accordingly which leaded to the expected build problem where I now would
like to ask for further help in porting the code to the current
libghc-text. Unfortunately upstream has not (yet?) answered my mail
about putting the code on stackage.org - I'd ping again preferably
including a patch porting the code to a recent version.
This is the snippet from the build log:
...
3 of 8] Compiling Bio.Phylogeny.PhyBin.PreProcessor ( Bio/Phylogeny/PhyBin/PreProcessor.hs, dist-ghc/build/Bio/Phylogeny/PhyBin/PreProcessor.o )
[4 of 8] Compiling Bio.Phylogeny.PhyBin.RFDistance ( Bio/Phylogeny/PhyBin/RFDistance.hs, dist-ghc/build/Bio/Phylogeny/PhyBin/RFDistance.o )
Bio/Phylogeny/PhyBin/RFDistance.hs:313:9:
Not in scope: `unsafeIOToST'
...
I hope that the patch is not to hard to find but I personally have
no idea about Haskell and unfortunately need your help here.
Thanks a lot for your help so far
Andreas.
[1] git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/phybin.git
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:08:40PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, den 09.12.2015, 23:00 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> > > hierarchical-clustering seems to be compatible with everything we
> > > have right now.
> >
> > uploaded.
--
http://fam-tille.de
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list