[Debian-med-packaging] fw4spl_0.9.2-1_amd64.changes is NEW

Andreas Tille andreas at an3as.eu
Fri Mar 6 17:45:18 UTC 2015

Hi Corentin,

usually these rejects are based on missing license statements which
can often found using:

$ licensecheck -r * | grep -v -e UNKNOWN -e GENERATED
SrcLib/core/fwZip/include/minizip/unzip.h: zlib/libpng
SrcLib/core/fwZip/include/minizip/zip.h: zlib/libpng

So mentioning these files in d/copyright with their license should be
one reason for the message below.  Another thing could be that several
directories contain two files: COPYING and COPYING.LESSER.  May be
Thorsten wants that this should be mentioned explicitly?

I have no better clue since Thorsten is usually more explicit
(specifically to newcomers).  If he would not provide more items
that make this package looking like a reject we should probably
ask after fixing things above whether he is more happy with the
diff or if there are remaining things.

Kind regards


On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:13:03PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> >binary:fw4spl is NEW.
> >source:fw4spl is NEW.
> Oooh, it is late to write a detailed email, but this looks like a
> reject ...
>   Thorsten


More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list