[Debian-med-packaging] pyfaidx package for Debian [ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org: python-pyfaidx_0.4.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED]

[Andreas Tille]

(I was answering the wrong mail)


Hi again,

I just realised that the source download does not contain the admittedly
large dataset and thus some unit tests are failing.  That's an issue
since when Debian packages are built the test suite is runned as part
of the build process.

Would you consider adding the test data again or add some option to
run a restricted test that does not require the large data sets?

Kind regards and thanks again for the very quick response

      Andreas.


On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:19:40PM -0500, Matt Shirley wrote:
> Hi Andreas. Thanks for this effort! I'm glad you asked for clarification on this oversight. The license is BSD3 and I've just released a new version with this change (v0.4.5) which should be on PyPI within the hour. 
> 
> Best,
> 
> Matt Shirley
> 
> > On Nov 16, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > the Debian Med team is trying to package all relevant free biological
> > software for main Debian.  I have created packages from pyfaidx for the
> > so called task for development of biological applications[1].
> > 
> > Unfortunately it was not yet accepted since there are different licenses
> > mentioned in the LICENSE file (BSD 3 clause) and setup.py which
> > mentiones MIT.
> > 
> > Could you please clarify what license is valid for the whole package?
> > 
> > Kind regards and thanks for providing pyfaidx as free software
> > 
> >       Andreas.
> > 
> > 
> > [1] http://blends.debian.org/med/tasks/bio-dev#python-pyfaidx
> > 
> > ----- Forwarded message from Thorsten Alteholz <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> -----
> > 
> > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:00:13 +0000
> > From: Thorsten Alteholz <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org>
> > To: Debian Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org>, Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org>
> > Subject: python-pyfaidx_0.4.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Andreas,
> > 
> > LICENSE and setup.py seem to be divided over the license/copyright information. 
> > Can you please clarify with upstream who is right?
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > Thorsten
> > 
> > ===
> > 
> > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> > concerns.
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> > Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
> > 
> > 
> > ----- End forwarded message -----
> > 
> > -- 
> > http://fam-tille.de
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de