[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#797793: Test failure of python-htseq on 32bit arches

[Andreas Tille]

Hi again Simon,

I wonder whether you noticed this report.  The issue keeps htseq out of
Debian and as far as I can see it might be a non-issue.  The difference
between the Expected and the actual result does not look critical to me
at all and I wonder whether it is just a matter of adjusting the
comparison a bit.  If you confirm that my suspicion is correct I could
volunteer to take over this but your confirmation would be really
helpful here.

Thanks

     Andreas.

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:26:23PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> I guess/hope you know that the Debian Med team (namely Diane Trout)
> packaged htslib for the Debian distribution.  Recently we upgraded to
> the latest version (0.6.1p1) which caused some trouble with one test
> (out of 37) for 32 bit architectures.  The issue is reported as Debian
> bug #797793.  For instance here is one build log of i386:
> 
>    https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=htseq&arch=i386&ver=0.6.1p1-1&stamp=1439721264
> 
> with the critical part of
> 
> python2.7 test/test.py
> Doctest of tss.rst:
> **********************************************************************
> File "../doc/tss.rst", line 114, in tss.rst
> Failed example:
>     wincvg
> Expected:
>     array([0, 0, 0, ..., 0, 0, 0], dtype=int32)
> Got:
>     array([0, 0, 0, ..., 0, 0, 0])
> **********************************************************************
> 1 items had failures:
>    1 of  37 in tss.rst
> ***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
> 1 of 37 tests failed.
> 
> 
> Could you please give some hint how to deal with this?
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>        Andreas.
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de