[Debian-med-packaging] Please consider manual building of phyml on mipsel architecture

[Aurelien Jarno]

On 2016-04-21 16:28, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi mips porters,
> 
> I noticed that phyml does not build on mipsel[1] but it has built
> before.  Since I remember that different porter boxes behave differently
> it might be possible that some manual intervention is needed.  Please
> could you take the necessary action to let phyml pass and migrate to
> testing?

In general packages should be built on the build daemons, not manually.
In that case the issue was related to a bug in openmpi that has been
fixed since the package has been built. Requeuing the package was
enough, it has been built successfully and uploaded.

In the future, please mail mipsel at buildd.debian.org for such requests.

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien at aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20160421/3cf09466/attachment.sig>