[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#833760: cufflinks: please use the default boost version
Andreas Tille
tille at debian.org
Fri Aug 12 20:59:11 UTC 2016
Hi Mattia,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 07:33:06PM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Hi Andreas! :)
>
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:54:08PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Currently I can't upload since
> > cufflinks does not build. If the new version of liblemon would not have
> > been rejected by ftpmaster for a reason others do not agree with[2] we
> > could have started to port cufflinks to the new liblemon library (which
> > is definitely not a trivial change but seems to me a promising way to
> > deal with the issue anyway - probably in connection with upstream).
>
> Be aware that except from a package that is already being NMUed and
> digikam that regressed yesterday, this is actually the only package
> blocking the removal
Sorry, this does not help. There is this large thread on
debian-devel[2] which I triggered and which IMHO goes totally in the
wrong direction nitpicking about copyrights inside binary packages which
is IMHO orthogonal to the interest of our users (would a user really
*copy* from binary results and if this really stupid intention is really
done would this person care about copyright at all? - may be I'll write
something in this thread but I'm afraid that's just a waste of time).
Cufflinks just does not build (neither with boost 1.60 nor 1.61 and
I have no chance to upload it. Feel free to request the removal of
1.60 since it does not change the situation.
> > [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/08/msg00099.html
>
> /me does some lobbying for it.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list