[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#803542: trnascan-se_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Afif Elghraoui
afif at ghraoui.name
Thu Feb 4 05:27:07 UTC 2016
Hi, Thorsten,
على الثلاثاء 2 شباط 2016 04:00، كتب Thorsten Alteholz:
>
> there seems to be something wrong with this package.
> A DFSG package should not be in non-free.
>
This is the package that you rejected last November because of the
non-free file dbmalloc.h [1]. The package has the +dfsg suffix because I
excluded the postscript Manual.ps which cannot be built from source.
It's my understanding that even non-free packages should meet the dfsg
as far as possible.
Would you prefer I put the Manual.ps back in so that there is no
repacked tarball? Otherwise, do you have a more appropriate alternative
to +dfsg for the repack suffix?
Thanks and regards
Afif
1.
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2015-November/036574.html
--
Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
http://afif.ghraoui.name
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list