[Debian-med-packaging] spades_3.6.2+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Andreas Tille
andreas at an3as.eu
Mon Feb 8 12:56:46 UTC 2016
Hi Sascha,
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:38:30AM +0000, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> Just to keep you updated, I have worked my way through:
>
> /vagrant/spades/src $ git grep opyrig | grep -v etersbur | cut -f1 -d:
>
> as well and added missing license info to d/copyright. Pushed just now.
Great!
> Something that caught my eye is that SPades includes a copy of the RSA
> MD5 implementation, which contains an advertising clause which is
> probably not DFSG compliant. It might be possible to patch the code
> similar to [1] (replace with Colin Plumb's free implementation).
> Interesting that other packages retain that code (e.g. [2]).
I currently can't research the details behind (which I'm not aware of).
Any chance to use Debian packaged code rather than any code copy?
> Any comments? If we want to patch can look into this later.
Any opinion about the wrapper issue?
Nice to realise that you are safely back. I also just landed in Berlin
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list