[Debian-med-packaging] libjung-free-java_2.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Michael R. Crusoe]

Hello Thorsten,

Agreed that java source jars aren't my idea of an ideal distribution
format, but that is what upstream delivers.

With regards to the license issue: Andreas just uploaded a fixed package
that I created.

https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libjung-free-java_2.0.1+dfsg-1.html

I dropped the jung-3d-* jars and rebuilt to source to properly them and the
jung-jai* jars as well.

Thank you for catching this problem; your assistance is appreciated.

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:00 PM Thorsten Alteholz <
ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:

>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I am not sure whether jar files are the preferred form for modification.
>
> Anyway, such statement:
>  * You acknowledge that this software is not designed, licensed or
>  * intended for use in the design, construction, operation or
>  * maintenance of any nuclear facility.
> makes the software non-free.
>
> Thanks!
>  Thorsten
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20160114/ad4b58fc/attachment.html>