[Debian-med-packaging] ngs-sdk_1.2.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Andreas Tille]

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:00:19PM +0000, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> 
> Hi Olivier,
> 
> such statements doesn't really fit into main:
>  * Copyright (c) 2006, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
>  * ORACLE PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL.  Use is subject to license terms.
> 
> ngs-1.2.3/ngs-sdk/language/java/jni.h
> ngs-1.2.3/ngs-sdk/language/java/jni_md.h

These files can also be found in

   /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include/

Do you think it is possible to use these (while patching these three
files

$ grep '"jni[_md]*.h"' ngs-sdk/language/java/*
ngs-sdk/language/java/jni_ErrorMsg.hpp:#include "jni.h"
ngs-sdk/language/java/jni.h:#include "jni_md.h"
ngs-sdk/language/java/jni_String.hpp:#include "jni.h"

and use <> instead of "" (all other include statements are just using
<>).

If you check for instance:

diff -ub /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include/jni.h ngs-sdk/language/java/jni.h 

This is basically the same file.  The files jni_md.h have some
differences but I guess this is since
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include/jni_md.h is a symlink to linux/jni_md.h
and may be the file in ngs-sdk supports some other OSes - at least I found
some

-#define JNICALL
+#ifdef _WIN32

What do you think about this plan?  Alternatively we could take over the
*full* copyright from the files in /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include/
that is more explicit.

Kind regards

        Andreas.
> At least you should add the "license terms".

This would save us from 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de