[Debian-med-packaging] PDL 2.016 - transition from pdlapi-10 to pdlapi-12
Andreas Tille
andreas at fam-tille.de
Sun Jun 19 17:45:46 UTC 2016
0-day NMU (or team upload) are perfectly fine.
Thanks for your work on this
Andreas.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 05:10:20PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> PDL has been moved to the Debian Perl team along with
> libpdl-io-hdf5-perl and libpdl-netcdf-perl. [0] The packages have been
> updated to the latest upstream releases and incorporate current
> packaging best practices.
>
> As part of the update to PDL 2.016 a transition is required because the
> virtual pdlapi package provided by pdl was bumped from pdlapi-10 to
> pdlapi-12.
>
> All pdl reverse dependencies built successfully with the PDL 2.016
> packages available in experimental as summarized below.
>
> Not all reverse dependencies were using dh_pdl to set the dependency on
> the virtual pdlapi package, these have all been fixed in git. All
> reverse dependencies have changes available in git to modernize the
> packaging, these will be uploaded to unstable as part of the pdl transition.
>
> I'd like to ask permission for a 0-day NMU of libtfbs-perl from the
> Debian Med team to have it migrate to testing at the same time as the
> other packages involved in the pdl transition instead of after a 10 day
> delay. I intent to upload the changes reported in #827499 [1],
> additionally the build dependency for pdl will require at least version
> 2.016 to ensure the buildds don't build with the old version.
>
> Next Friday, June 24th, I intent to upload pdl (1:2.016-1) to unstable,
> and upload all reverse dependencies (re)built with pdl (1:2.016-1) too.
>
> If explicit permission for a 0-day NMU of libtfbs-perl is not received
> before the start of the transition, libtfbs-perl (0.7.0+dfsg-1.1) will
> be uploaded to DELAYED/10 instead (per Dev Ref section 5.11 [2]).
>
> libtfbs-perl currently lacks the dependency on the virtual pdlapi
> package, because it was not using dh_pdl yet. This prevents libtfbs-perl
> from blocking testing migration of the other packages, a fortunate
> side-effect.
>
>
> [0]
> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/2016-June/099701.html
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/827499
> [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu
>
>
> Transition: pdl
>
> pdl (1:2.007-5) -> pdl (1:2.016-1)
> pdlapi-10 -> pdlapi-12
>
> The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.
>
> libpdl-graphics-gnuplot-perl (2.005-3) OK
> libpdl-io-hdf5-perl (1:0.73-1) OK
> libpdl-io-matlab-perl (0.005-2) OK
> libpdl-linearalgebra-perl (0.12-2) OK
> libpdl-netcdf-perl (4.20-2) OK
> libpdl-stats-perl (0.75-1~exp1) OK
> libtfbs-perl (0.7.0+dfsg-1.1) OK
>
> Please note that these are mostly UNRELEASED version from git.
>
> For libtfbs-perl the NMU from #827499 was used.
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bas
>
> --
> GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
> Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list