[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#807580: Bug#807580: More licensing issues (Was: BLAT license)
Andreas Tille
andreas at an3as.eu
Mon Mar 14 20:09:20 UTC 2016
Hi all,
I've realised that there is a new upstream release of rtracklayer
(1.30.2) but the files in question have not yet changed. I realised
that the description says:
ExtraLicenses: The files in the 'src/ucsc' directory are licensed for
all use by Jim Kent, in a manner compatible with the Artistic
2.0 license.
It seems that the issue is settled but are there any other resources for
this statement than one of Jim's mails? I would like to refer to some
authoritative statement to close the bug report in the Debian BTS.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 11:55:17PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 08:37:36AM -0800, Jim Kent a écrit :
> > Actually though, looking at Mozilla Public LIcense, the only differences I
> > don't care much about, so if it makes it easier, I can release it under
> > that as well.
>
> Thanks Jim, I am sure it is helpful, not only for Bioconductor, but also for
> any other project which would like to pick up the same files form the UCSC
> browser sources. Designed years after the CDDL, the MPL 2.0 was carefully
> worded to avoid ambiguities and incompatibilities (not just with the GNU GPL,
> but also with the Apache License).
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Charles Plessy
> Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list