[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#830984: fixed in ball 1.4.3~beta1-2 -- only on amd64

Danny Edel debian at danny-edel.de
Sun Nov 13 18:01:15 UTC 2016


On 11/13/2016 05:55 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Danny,
> 
> I fully agree that we should ignore test results on other than amd64
> architecture.  Please let me know if you intend to implement the needed
> change or whether you suggest that I should do so.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>       Andreas.
> 

Hello Andreas,

I have created and git-pushed a patch to debian/rules.  I did not update
the changelog, since it didn't look like the one uploaded to unstable
earlier today and I wanted to avoid a merge conflict on your side.

If you could review / edit changelog / upload, that would be nice.

A quick test on an i386 chroot with the build command replaced by
/bin/true suggests it does exactly what it's supposed to.  It ran the
test suite, ignored the inevitable error and issued a diagnostic.  It
even printed my warning multiple times : )  The computer will ignore it
of course, but it might prompt a human reader to get involved.

If the new revision actually builds, I would suggest we keep this bug
open (I wrote the bug number into d/rules) and downgrade its severity to
important.

I don't have the time right now to dig into the i386 issues in detail.
If that changes, I might un-dust my old Celeron-based laptop and let it
compile for a few days.  If it can actually run stretch/sid.  I remember
reading something on d-devel about raising the minimum processor
requirements for the i386 port…

Cheers,

	Danny

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 484 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20161113/5e7f598c/attachment.sig>


More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list