[Debian-med-packaging] updating camitk package

Mattia Rizzolo mattia at debian.org
Fri Sep 30 22:15:18 UTC 2016


On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:10:16PM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:27:04PM +0200, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
> > Although a bit later than I planned, I am working on packaging the latest
> > camitk version and removing the RC bug #836990 [1].
> > It seems that gbp was really much my friend, Andreas, you were right once
> > again!
> 
> Oh, looks like this is a package I touched :)
> 
> > I am not sure I did the right thing for the tags (please let me know).
> 
> looks so, yes.  Though you didn't push the upstream branch, nor
> pristine-tar, please push those too.

Also please consider to do your changes in multiple commits, and not
only one, as it makes a lot more easier to review (talking about commit
808838351792dec92b11abf2cc950f87ddc5af15).
And the tag for 4.0.2 is missing too.

> 
> > It seems that everything is working alright now apart from some lintian
> > errors when I run:
> > lintian camitk_4.0.3-1_amd64.changes
> > 
> > I got the following warnings:
> > W: libqtpropertybrowser4-dbgsym: debug-file-with-no-debug-symbols
> > usr/lib/debug/.build-id/91/1d4f921b422722c4cf8434c5871e1262be4a9d.debug
> > W: libcamitk-dev-dbgsym: debug-file-with-no-debug-symbols
> > usr/lib/debug/.build-id/b0/2acef59f738ea491379288279915c713a3aeb9.debug
> ...
> 
> Those are usually due to the building not using -g, or for the file
> being stripped before dh_strip can do it (and put the debugging info
> into the -dbgsym packages).
> 
> So you should check whether -g is passed and if not fix it (it also
> implies that the package doesn't respect dpkg-buildflags), and if it is
> scan its build system and check for stripping (which could also happen
> if `install -s` is used, be aware).
> 
> > Can anyone help me with that? Or should I add overrides for the
> > corresponding packages?
> 
> lintian overrides are not a solution.  At least, in nearly all cases I
> came across, overrides were used mostly only as a mean to hide issues.
> 
> -- 
> regards,
>                         Mattia Rizzolo
> 
> GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
> more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
> Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
> Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-



-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20160930/ff452432/attachment.sig>


More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list