[Debian-med-packaging] phast_1.4+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Chris Lamb lamby at debian.org
Sun Nov 5 22:40:51 UTC 2017


Hi,

> Philip Hazel is the author of a code copy of the pcre library which was
> removed from phast source.  Should I patch the LICENSE.txt file to
> reflect this or is it OK to re-upload as is?

Re-upload but clarify this situation in debian/copyright so that people
not privy this conversation can see it (eg. our downstreams or even
myself after I've popped this out of my brain...).


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby at debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list