[Debian-med-packaging] Different symbols files on different architectures

[Julien Yann Dutheil]

Dear Andreas,

Have propagated changes to other libs, hope I did it right. In addition, I
have released bppsuite, trying to address the lintian warnings I got. There
was notably one with missing -g when compiling, which I addressed by adding
an override in rules. Maybe you want to give it a look and assess whether
this was the right way of handling the issue. I also removed Vcs-Browser
and Vcs-Git which gave deprecated warnings in lintian. Also, with changes
upstream there was no more patch needed and I removed them, but kept the
patches directory and empty 'series' file. Should I remove the whole
directory instead?

Best,

Julien.

On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 08:07:47AM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote:
> > I agree with your solution. The original idea of adding symbol files was
> to
> > detect interface changes between releases. Appart from very rare
> > exceptions, interface break on one architecture should also lead to
> > interface break on others, so that should be enough to have the symbols
> for
> > amd64 only.
>
> That's exactly my consideration.
>
> > I have pushed libbpp-qt 2.4.0, but did not add the symbol file yet. If
> you
> > show me your solution for one lib, I can propagate it to others.
>
> Done and uploaded for libbpp-core.
>
> Kind regards
>
>         Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>



-- 
Julien Y. Dutheil, Ph-D
0 (+49) 6421 178 986

§ Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology
Molecular Systems Evolution
Department of Evolutionary Genetics
Plön -- GERMANY

§ Institute of Evolutionary Sciences - Montpellier
University of Montpellier 2 -- FRANCE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20180408/f42fd90b/attachment.html>