[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#907624: What ffindex do we want to package

[Andreas Tille]

Ping?
Steffen, if you did not had a specific reason I assume it was by
mistake and will replace the Segfaulting code by the original one.
If I do not hear from you I assume you will agree.
Kind regards, Andreas.

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:53:38AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> after reading https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab/issues/4
> I came to the conclusion that we somehow picked the wrong fork of
> ffindex.  For me it seems very probable that if we pick the old codebase
> bug #907624 which was introduced when choosing this will vanish if we
> revert to the previously packaged code base.  I have a local commit
> which is doing this:
> 
> 
> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> index 6a26115..c409f4f 100644
> --- a/debian/changelog
> +++ b/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
> +ffindex (0.9.9.7+sog+git20160415.14274c9-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * The previous location on Github was an improperly choosen fork
> +    (see https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab/issues/4)
> +    Here the version is now named "0.9.9.7+sog" (Saved On Github)
> +    to make it alphabethically later than the previous one.
> +
> + -- Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org>  Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:16:09 +0100
> +
>  ffindex (0.9.9.7+soedinglab+git20180802.74550c8-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  
>    * Fix watch file (version should actually be +git20171201.74550c8 but
> diff --git a/debian/watch b/debian/watch
> index 91b4f38..b47f123 100644
> --- a/debian/watch
> +++ b/debian/watch
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>  version=4
>  
> -opts="mode=git,pretty=0.9.9.7+soedinglab+git%cd.%h" \
> -    https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab.git HEAD
> +opts="mode=git,pretty=0.9.9.7+sog+git%cd.%h" \
> +    https://github.com/ahcm/ffindex.git HEAD
> 
> 
> 
> Upstream at github.com/ahcm/ffindex was extremely quick to tag a
> release and so it is at least active.
> 
> Steffen, was your pick intentional or did you just stumbled by chance
> over the other fork?  Are you OK with reverting to the old code?
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>       Andreas.
> 
> PS: I reported the segfault issue to the according fork anyway
>     https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab/issues/7
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de
> 
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de