[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#902132: Bug#902132: falcon: FTBFS since python-networkx version 2.1-1; fails in test suite

Afif Elghraoui afif at debian.org
Wed Sep 12 16:04:02 BST 2018


Hello,

On September 12, 2018 5:30:59 AM EDT, Andreas Tille <andreas at an3as.eu> wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>> Well, according upstream, current repository is not active anymore:
>> 
>> 
>> Oh, sorry. We are no longer mirroring our internal FALCON repo here.
>In
>> fact, I think this Issues board will disappear soon too, in favor of
>> pbbioconda. So I think your source-code is way out of date.
>> Unfortunately, my hands are tied.
>> 
>> https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/FALCON/issues/672
>
>Thanks for your research on this issue.
> 
>> I am not sure how to get the source from pbbioconda and if this
>source
>> is suitable for packaging at all.
>
>I added a comment to the issue above where I've found a link inside the
>bioconda metadata[1] (assuming this is what upstream was refereing to).
>We can surely package where those meta.yaml files are pointing to but
>see my comments.
>
>It would be extremely helpful if we would find somebody at PacBio who
>can explain the situation (Afif?  I know you said you are not using the
>pb* software any more, but can you possibly help out?).  As I wrote on
>Monday[2] I have another issue with a lib from there.
>

The pbbioconda being referred to looks like https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbbioconda
and the README there lists all their packages and links to their main bioconda pages.

Andreas, I think the pb-falcon you found is the right one as far as I can tell.

regards
Afif


> 
>
>[1]
>https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/blob/master/recipes/pb-falcon/meta.yaml
>[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2018/09/msg00152.html
>
>-- 
>http://fam-tille.de



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list