[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#927313: parsinsert: probably broken on armhf, failing autopkgtests in Ubuntu
Steve Langasek
steve.langasek at canonical.com
Thu Dec 5 20:16:56 GMT 2019
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 07:13:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:52:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > So your suggestion is that for future uploads we should run the test
> > > written in Debian as autopkgtest as a test for the upstream code.
> > Yes, this would catch the problem earlier and fail to build the package on
> > architectures where it is broken. Then you could request the old binaries be
> > removed from the archive.
> I've implemented this and according to
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=parsinsert
> all architectures are passing. Am I missing something?
Well, this package version appears to also build now in Ubuntu on arm64 and
armhf but not on ppc64el:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parsinsert/1.04-6
so it looks like there has perhaps been improvement in the
cross-architecture compatibility of this package since the bug was initially
filed.
> > > > Note that these tests also fail on arm64, i386, and ppc64el in Ubuntu,
> > > > suggestings the packages are also broken there, but none of these are
> > > > regressions.
> >
> > > Thanks a lot for these hints
> >
> > My pleasure!
>
> :-)
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20191205/9439d8e1/attachment.sig>
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list