[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#909071: pbbam: FTBFS on every release architecture where it previously built (fwd)
Steve Langasek
steve.langasek at canonical.com
Tue Feb 5 20:56:53 GMT 2019
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:45:33PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:06:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:35:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > And then there is the unrelated #908269 that currently prevents testing
> > > migration of pbbam.
> > > Steve seems to be addressing this with
> > > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/409374477/pbbam_0.19.0+dfsg-1ubuntu3_0.19.0+dfsg-1ubuntu4.diff.gz
> > Yes, but the net result of this change is that now the autopkgtest fails by
> > running out of memory during the package build at test time, which is why I
> > haven't submitted a better patch to the BTS.
> > I think the ideal here would be to either have a way to generate just the
> > single data file we need for the tests, or to capture that file from the
> > package build and ship it in a binary package, so that we don't have to do a
> > full rebuild during the autopkgtests.
> Thanks a lot for the time you have spent into this leaf package. I
> think it is absolutely realistic that this package these days and also
> for the next couple of years will be practically used only on amd64
> architecture. It might be sensible to draw a line here and simply
> declare this package and its rdepends "Architecture: amd64" and move on
> with problems that might affect more users and realistic applications
> for other architectures.
> What do you think?
I have no opinion. I recognize that pretty much everyone working in this
domain is using x86, but I also know that Debian and Ubuntu run quite well
on both arm64 and ppc64el servers (the other two architectures pbbam
supports); and Amazon has recently announced ARM64 cloud instances which are
a fraction of the price of x86; so if I were the maintainer I would probably
leave these enabled.
Regardless, the autopkgtest problem is not amd64-specific, because at least
for Ubuntu, we do not size our autopkgtest runners any differently on amd64
than on other architectures. Fixing the autopkgtest to not require a full
source build for one data file would allow the autopkgtest to run (and
likely succeed) on all available archs.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20190205/c1907e57/attachment.sig>
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list